At the Ñý¼§Ö±²¥, we are committed to fostering a safe, inclusive, and equitable environment for all members of our campus community. This FAQ page is designed to provide clear, accessible answers to common questions about Equal Opportunity and Title IX—covering everything from reporting concerns to understanding your rights and accessing support.
General Policy Information
-
Title IX is a federal law that protects people from sex-based discrimination in schools that receive federal funding. It covers things like sexual harassment, sexual assault, domestic/dating violence, and stalking in education programs or activities. At the Ñý¼§Ö±²¥, the Office of Conflict, Resolution, & Policy (CRP Office) helps individuals by taking reports, offering support, and guiding them through their options, including filing a Formal Complaint. You can reach them by calling (406) 243-5710, emailing conflict@umontana.edu, or visiting University Hall Room 004—they’re there to make sure you feel safe and supported on campus.
-
The Ñý¼§Ö±²¥’s Discrimination, Harassment, and Retaliation Policy is guided by several federal and state laws that protect individuals from unfair treatment in education and employment. These include federal laws like Title VI and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act, the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, the Equal Pay Act, and Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act (GINA). At the state level, the policy is shaped by the Montana Human Rights Act and Montana’s Constitution, which guarantee individual dignity and prohibit discrimination based on characteristics like race, sex, age, disability, and more.
-
The Discrimination, Harassment, & Retaliation Policy and the Sexual Harassment Policy at the Ñý¼§Ö±²¥ are closely connected and sometimes overlap, but they serve slightly different purposes. The Sexual Harassment Policy specifically addresses behaviors that fall under Title IX, such as sexual assault, stalking, and dating or domestic violence. The Discrimination, Harassment, & Retaliation Policy covers a broader range of protected characteristics, including race, religion, disability, age, and more—alongside sex and gender-based issues that may not meet the Title IX definitions. If a report involves conduct that doesn’t meet the criteria for Title IX but still reflects unfair or harmful treatment, it may be addressed under the broader Discrimination Policy. In short, the two policies work together to ensure all forms of discrimination and harassment are addressed through the most appropriate process.
-
It depends. These cases are reviewed individually to see if there’s a connection to the University. For example, if something happens during a UM-sponsored trip or event off campus, or if the behavior seriously affects a student’s ability to feel safe or succeed at school—like if both Ñý¼§Ö±²¥ are in the same academic program—the policy might still apply. Even if an incident happens off campus, you can still report it to the CRP Office. While the University may not have full authority to investigate (called adjudicatory jurisdiction), the CRP Office can still offer supportive measures, provide guidance, and in some cases, take non-punitive steps to address the situation.
-
The Ñý¼§Ö±²¥ works to enforce sexual harassment, discrimination, harassment, and retaliation policies while also respecting free speech and academic freedom. It does this by focusing on behavior that is discriminatory or harassing—not just speech that may be offensive. The goal is to create a safe learning environment without limiting open discussion or academic exploration when it's done appropriately.
-
UM strictly prohibits retaliation against anyone who submits a report, participates in an investigation, or supports someone involved in a case. This means no one can legally be punished, threatened, harassed, or treated unfairly for being part of the process. If retaliation does happen, it can lead to disciplinary action against the person responsible. The University takes these protections seriously to make sure everyone feels safe coming forward.
Reporting and Confidentiality
-
Yes, you can report an incident anonymously to the UM’s CRP Office. While providing names can help the University offer support and take action, anonymous reports are accepted and reviewed to determine if any follow-up is possible. Keep in mind that anonymous reports may limit the University’s ability to investigate or respond fully.
However, Mandatory Reporters—which includes all non-confidential University employees—cannot submit anonymous reports; they are required to share all known details, including names, when they learn about possible sexual harassment in the course of their job.
-
Mandatory Reporters at the Ñý¼§Ö±²¥ include all University employees, including student employees when acting in their work role, except for Confidential Resources like licensed counselors, medical staff at Curry Health Center, and SARC advocates. Their main responsibility is to promptly report any information they receive about possible sexual harassment to the CRP Office. This includes details like names, dates, locations, and a description of the conduct. They are not supposed to investigate or judge what happened—just report what they know.
-
UM requires employees to be Mandatory Reporters to help ensure that Ñý¼§Ö±²¥ and others affected by sexual harassment get the support and help they need as soon as possible. This policy helps the University respond quickly, offer resources, and take steps to stop and prevent harmful behavior. It also shows UM’s commitment to creating a safe, respectful, and inclusive campus for everyone.
-
If you want to speak confidentially, you can reach out to Confidential Resources, who are not required to report what you share. These include licensed counselors at Curry Health Center, medical staff, and advocates at the Student Advocacy Resource Center (SARC). These professionals can provide emotional support, guidance, and help you explore your options without making an official report.
Supportive Measures
-
Supportive Measures are free services and adjustments offered by the University to help individuals feel safe, supported, and able to continue their education or work after experiencing or reporting sexual harassment, discrimination, harassment, or retaliation. These can include things like counseling referrals, academic or housing changes, schedule adjustments, safety planning, and no-contact orders. Supportive Measures are available to both the person affected (Complainant) and the person accused (Respondent).
-
Yes, you can receive Supportive Measures even if the case is not being investigated. The University offers these services to help you stay safe and supported without requiring you to go through a full investigation or disciplinary process.
-
The University can provide a variety of Supportive Measures depending on your needs. These may include counseling referrals, changes to class or work schedules, housing adjustments, extensions on assignments, campus escort services, no-contact orders, and increased security or safety planning.
-
Only the people who need to know to provide support will be told about your Supportive Measures. This could include staff like your professors, housing, or campus security—but only as much as necessary to carry out the changes. The University keeps this information as private as possible and does not share it widely or publicly.
Sexual Harassment Procedure
General
-
UM’s Sexual Harassment Procedures are based on federal Title IX rules, which say how schools must handle reports of sexual harassment. They explain how reports are handled, what support is available, and what steps might follow if someone chooses to move forward with a formal complaint.
-
After you make a report to the CRP Office at UM, someone from the office will reach out to you. They’ll offer supportive measures (like academic accommodations, resource referrals, or counseling referrals) and explain your options, including how to file a Formal Complaint if you want the University to investigate. The CRP Office will not start an investigation without your request—unless they believe it’s necessary to protect campus safety.
-
UM may decide to start an investigation even if the Complainant doesn’t request one when there’s a serious or ongoing risk to campus safety. This can include situations where the reported behavior is especially severe, involves repeated incidents, affects multiple people, or if the person accused is in a position of power (like a faculty or staff member). In these cases, the Title IX Coordinator can file an Institutional Formal Complaint.
-
Your identity will be handled with care during the resolution process. UM takes privacy seriously and will keep your information as confidential as possible, sharing it only with people who need to know in order to respond to the report. However, it's important to understand that if a formal complaint is filed and the case moves forward, the person accused (the Respondent) has due process rights—which means they have the right to know who made the complaint and who provided evidence or testimony against them. While complete confidentiality can’t be guaranteed in these cases, the University still works hard to protect your privacy and personal information throughout the process and will only share what’s necessary to ensure a fair and respectful resolution
Filing and Resolution
-
A Formal Complaint is a written document that starts the official investigation process for sexual harassment at UM. It must be signed by the person affected (the Complainant) and state that they want the University to investigate the behavior. You can file it in person, by email, by mail, or online with the Title IX Coordinator. In most situations, the Title IX Coordinator can help prepare the complaint for you to review and sign.
-
During the initial assessment, the Title IX Coordinator will reach out to the person who made the report to offer support and explain their options, including how to file a Formal Complaint. They’ll also look at the report to decide if it falls under UM’s Sexual Harassment Policy, whether it can move forward, and if any immediate action is needed to protect individuals or the campus community. This step helps guide what happens next, but doesn’t start an investigation unless a Formal Complaint is filed or required.
-
Adaptive Resolution is a voluntary, informal process where both parties agree to work out a resolution with the help of a facilitator—this could include things like mediation or restorative conversations. It’s meant to resolve the situation without a formal investigation or hearing. Grievance Proceedings, on the other hand, are formal. They include an investigation, a live hearing, and possibly sanctions if there’s a finding of responsibility. Both processes aim to resolve the issue, but one is collaborative, while the other is structured and formal.
-
Yes, you can change your mind at any time during the Adaptive Resolution process. If you decide to stop, the University will end the informal process and can move forward with the formal Grievance Proceedings instead. You won’t be pressured to stay in Adaptive Resolution, and the decision to leave won’t be held against you.
-
The Ñý¼§Ö±²¥ aims to resolve a Formal Complaint in a reasonably prompt manner, usually within 90 to 120 business days. This includes time for the investigation, hearing, and any appeals. Some parts—like the investigation—are expected to take around 60 days, and the hearing decision about 30 to 40 days. Timelines can be adjusted depending on the situation, like if people are unavailable or law enforcement is involved.
Investigation & Hearing
-
During an investigation, you can expect to be contacted by an investigator who will gather information from you, the other party, and any witnesses. You’ll be able to share your side, provide evidence, and suggest people the investigator should talk to. Everyone involved will get notice before meetings and have time to prepare. After collecting all information, the investigator will share a draft report for you to review and give feedback before finalizing it. The goal is to make the process fair, thorough, and respectful for all involved
-
Yes, you can bring both an advisor and a support person with you. Your advisor can help you understand the process and will be the one to ask questions for you during a live hearing. Your support person is there for emotional support—they don’t speak or take part in the process but can sit with you. You can choose anyone for these roles, including a friend, family member, or attorney
-
During the hearing, your advisor plays an important role by asking questions (cross-examination) on your behalf. You won’t have to directly question the other party or any witnesses—your advisor does that for you. They can also help you prepare for the hearing, but they don’t speak for you outside of the questioning part. If you don’t have an advisor, the University will provide one at no cost, just for the hearing
-
Relevant evidence is anything that helps prove or disprove whether sexual harassment happened—this includes witness statements, texts, emails, or anything directly related to the reported incident. Impermissible evidence includes things like information protected by law (such as private medical or counseling records) unless the person gives written permission, and details about a person’s sexual history—unless it's directly related to proving consent or showing that someone else committed the conduct. The investigator decides what can and can’t be used based on these rules
-
Yes, your report will still be taken seriously even if you don’t have any personal evidence. The University has a responsibility to gather information as part of the investigation, which may include interviews, documents, or other sources that help clarify what happened. Your report alone is enough to start the process, and individuals involved in these resolution processes are trained to handle cases even when there is little or no physical evidence provided by the person making the report.
-
There’s no set limit to the number of witnesses you can identify in a sexual harassment case at UM. You’re encouraged to share the names of any individuals with relevant information. However, because UM is obligated to conduct a prompt and thorough investigation, the investigator may decide not to interview certain proposed witnesses if their testimony is likely to be redundant or duplicative. The goal is to balance fairness with an efficient process.
-
Character witnesses are not prohibited under UM’s sexual harassment process, but their relevance may be limited. The focus is primarily on what happened during the specific incident, so the most helpful witnesses are those who have direct knowledge or facts related to the case. If someone wants to speak about a person’s character, the University will consider whether that information is relevant based on the situation.
-
No, your advisor cannot also serve as a witness in a sexual harassment case at UM. Advisors have a specific role—to support you and, if needed, conduct cross-examination during a live hearing. Allowing someone to serve as both advisor and witness would create a conflict of interest and could compromise the fairness of the process. If someone with relevant information is serving as your advisor, you’ll need to choose a different person to act as your advisor so that individual can participate as a witness instead.
-
If your case goes through the formal Grievance Proceedings, a live hearing is part of the process—but you are not required to participate and can choose not to attend. While participating can help make sure your perspective is included, the choice is completely up to you
Witnesses
-
You were invited to interview because someone identified you as a witness who may have relevant information about an incident being reviewed under UM’s Sexual Harassment Policy. This could mean you saw or heard something directly, have helpful context, or know details that could support the investigation. Your participation is important to help ensure the University has a complete and accurate understanding of what happened. You’re not being accused of anything—you're being asked to share what you know in a fair and respectful process.
-
No, you are not required to participate in the resolution process as a witness. However, your input can be really valuable in helping the University understand what happened and make a fair decision. While you have the right to decline or choose not to answer certain questions, the University encourages witnesses to cooperate if they feel safe and comfortable doing so, as it supports a thorough and accurate investigation.
-
Yes, the parties involved in the case will have access to your testimony, because both sides have the right to review and respond to the evidence as part of a fair process. While your name will not appear in the investigation report, the content of your statements will be shared, and the parties may be able to connect the information back to you. To help protect your identity, the University uses a witness key that keeps your name separate from the report, but full anonymity cannot be guaranteed
-
Yes, you will have an opportunity to review your testimony before it is included in the investigation report and shared with the parties. This helps ensure your input is accurately represented and gives you a chance to make clarifications or corrections. Any feedback you provide will be considered by the investigator and may be incorporated at their discretion, but regardless, your feedback will be included verbatim in an appendix of the final report.
-
Yes, witnesses are protected from retaliation under UM’s policies. This means no one is allowed to threaten, intimidate, harass, or take negative action against you for participating in a Title IX or discrimination-related investigation. Retaliation is a serious policy violation on its own and can lead to disciplinary action. If you believe you’re experiencing retaliation because you served as a witness, you should report it immediately to the CRP Office so the University can take steps to protect you and address the behavior.
Sanctions & Appeals
-
If someone is found responsible for sexual harassment at UM, the sanctions depend on several factors, including whether the Respondent is a student or employee, the severity of the behavior, its impact on others, and any prior misconduct. Examples of student sanctions include probation, suspension, expulsion, eviction from housing, educational programs, or restrictions from certain University activities or facilities. Employees sanctions may include written warnings, suspension, termination of employment, or other workplace-related consequences
-
You have the right to appeal a decision if you are a Complainant or Respondent in a sexual harassment case at UM. You can appeal if there was a procedural error, new evidence that wasn’t available before, or if there’s evidence of bias or conflict of interest by the people involved in the process. Appeals must be submitted within 10 days of receiving the written decision, and both parties have the same right to appeal under these rules
-
To start the appeals process, you must submit your appeal in writing within 10 days of receiving the decision. Your appeal must be based on one of these reasons: a procedural error, new evidence that could change the outcome, or bias/conflict of interest by someone involved in the case. Once you file, the other party is notified and can respond. An Appellate Officer—not involved in the original decision—reviews the appeal and issues a final decision. Both parties will receive the outcome at the same time, and this decision concludes the University’s process
Understanding Consent
-
Consent is an informed, voluntary, and mutual agreement to engage in sexual activity. In assessing whether consent was present, the University will evaluate all relevant facts and circumstances that the Respondent knew—or reasonably should have known—at the time. This includes whether there were mutually understandable words or actions that clearly communicated agreement between the parties.
-
No, silence or the absence of resistance does not mean consent under UM’s Sexual Harassment Policy. Consent must be a clear and active agreement—something you can see or hear through words or actions that show both people want to participate. Just because someone doesn’t say “no” or push back doesn’t mean they’re saying “yes”
-
Yes, consent can be withdrawn at any time under UM’s Sexual Harassment Policy. If an individual expresses that they no longer consent, the other person must immediately stop. Continuing after someone clearly withdraws their consent is not allowed and could be considered sexual misconduct.
-
Under UM’s Sexual Harassment Policy, someone can give consent while intoxicated, but not if they are incapacitated. Incapacitation means a person is so impaired—due to alcohol, drugs, or another condition—that they can’t understand what’s happening or can’t communicate a clear choice. Signs of incapacitation can include slurred speech, confusion, loss of consciousness, or lack of coordination. If someone is incapacitated, they cannot legally or meaningfully give consent.
-
A prior sexual history or relationship does not, in itself, indicate consent under UM’s Sexual Harassment Policy. Just because two people have been intimate before or are in a relationship doesn’t mean that consent is automatically given every time—consent must still be clearly given for each specific activity. However, individuals in a relationship may develop patterns or actions that help inform their understanding of each other’s consent, as long as it remains clear, mutual, and can still be withdrawn at any time.
-
If both parties were drinking, it doesn't automatically mean that consent wasn't possible—but under UM’s Sexual Harassment Policy, the key issue is whether either person was incapacitated. If someone was so impaired they couldn’t understand what was happening or couldn’t give clear, informed agreement, then they couldn’t legally consent. The University will look at all the facts to determine if either person was incapacitated and whether consent was clearly given and respected.
-
Consent given under coercion is not valid under UM’s Sexual Harassment Policy. Consent must be given freely and willingly—not because someone is being threatened, manipulated, or unreasonably pressured into saying yes. Coercive conduct is different from seductive conduct, and the difference depends on the type and amount of pressure used. If someone clearly says they don’t want to engage in a certain sexual activity, wants to stop, or doesn’t want to go further, and the other person continues to pressure them, that pressure can be considered coercive and invalidates consent.
-
No, under UM’s Sexual Harassment Policy, a person under the legal age of consent cannot give valid consent to sexual activity. In Montana, the legal age of consent is 16 years old. This means that anyone younger than 16 is legally not able to consent, even if they say “yes.” Any sexual activity with someone under that age is considered non-consensual under University policy and may also violate state law.
-
At UM, the question of whether valid consent was given is decided during the formal grievance process. The University (not the parties) has the burden to gather enough information to determine what happened. A trained investigator collects the evidence, and then a Hearing Panel reviews it and decides if consent was present, using the “preponderance of the evidence” standard—meaning it's more likely than not that the conduct occurred.
-
If you’re unsure whether someone is giving consent, stop and ask. Consent should be clear, enthusiastic, and ongoing, and if there’s any doubt, the best thing to do is pause and communicate. Don’t assume based on body language, past interactions, or silence—check in and make sure your partner is comfortable and willing. If they seem unsure, hesitant, or aren’t actively participating, that’s a sign to stop.
Discrimination, Harassment, & Retaliation Procedures
General
-
UM’s Discrimination Procedures are based on federal and state laws and are designed to align with the University’s broader policies and processes. They aim to ensure fairness, consistency, and compliance while also allowing for some flexibility so the University can respond thoughtfully to each situation. This flexibility helps UM take meaningful steps to stop harmful behavior, support those affected, and prevent it from happening again.
-
After you make a report, the Office of Conflict, Resolution, & Policy (CRP) will review it and may start with a preliminary assessment. This could involve meeting with you, looking over any available information, and possibly consulting with other offices. From there, the CRP may either close the case, offer supportive measures, take administrative action, or begin a formal investigation—depending on the situation. The goal is to address the concerns promptly and fairly, while keeping you informed throughout the process.
-
The CRP may close a case if the behavior reported doesn’t qualify as Prohibited Conduct under UM’s policy, or if there's not enough information to move forward—like when the identities of the people involved are unknown. A case may also be closed if the issue doesn’t involve the University directly, such as incidents that happen off-campus with no connection to UM programs or activities.
The CRP may take administrative action when it determines that a less formal approach is the best way to address the situation. This can include offering support to the person affected, providing education or training, or taking steps to prevent future issues. Administrative action is often used when the situation involves third parties, unknown individuals, or behavior that only becomes concerning when viewed as a pattern. The goal is to stop the behavior, prevent it from happening again, and address any impact it has had.
A formal investigation begins when a Formal Complaint is filed that includes enough detail to suggest that a policy violation may have occurred. This process involves gathering evidence, interviewing people involved, and determining whether the reported behavior violated UM’s policies.
-
Your identity will be handled with care during the resolution process. UM takes privacy seriously and will keep your information as confidential as possible, sharing it only with people who need to know in order to respond to the report. However, it's important to understand that if a formal complaint is filed and the case moves forward, the person accused (the Respondent) has due process rights—which means they have the right to know who made the complaint and who provided evidence or testimony against them. While complete confidentiality can’t be guaranteed in these cases, the University still works hard to protect your privacy and personal information throughout the process and will only share what’s necessary to ensure a fair and respectful resolution.
Filing and Investigation
-
A Formal Complaint is a written document submitted to the Office of Conflict, Resolution, & Policy (CRP) that officially requests the University to investigate alleged Prohibited Conduct by a specific person. It must include enough detail about what happened to suggest a possible policy violation. The CRP Office can help you understand whether filing a Formal Complaint is the right step and will guide you through the process. Once it’s filed, the University will notify the person being reported and begin the formal investigation process.
-
Adaptive Resolution is a voluntary, informal process where the Respondent agree to work out a resolution with the help of a facilitator—this could include things like mediation or restorative conversations. It’s meant to resolve the situation without a formal investigation or hearing. Grievance Proceedings, on the other hand, are formal. They include an investigation, determination, and possibly sanctions if there’s a finding of responsibility. Both processes aim to resolve the issue, but one is collaborative, while the other is structured and formal.
-
During an investigation, you can expect a fair, respectful, and thorough process. An investigator from the CRP Office will typically interview you, the other party involved, and any relevant witnesses. They'll also review any available evidence, like emails, messages, or documents. You can have an advisor with you during meetings, and you'll be kept informed about the steps in the process. The investigator will focus on gathering facts and will prepare a report summarizing the findings.
-
After gathering all the facts, the CRP Office prepares a written report that includes the evidence, statements, and analysis. If the case goes to formal adjudication, a decision-maker will review the report and decide if the policy was violated, based on a preponderance of the evidence. If so, appropriate actions or sanctions will follow.
-
You have the right to appeal a decision if you believe there was a procedural error, new evidence that wasn’t available earlier, or if there was a conflict of interest or bias by the people involved in handling the case. Appeals must be submitted in writing to the CRP Office within 10 days of receiving the decision. Once submitted, the other party will be notified and given a chance to respond. A designated Appellate Officer will review the appeal and issue a final decision, which will be shared with the Respondent.
Mandated Reporters
-
Yes. Student employees are considered mandatory reporters when they are working in their employee role, unless they are acting as a designated Confidential Resource.
-
Mandatory reporting obligations still apply. If a student is involved—whether the person affected (Complainant) and the person accused (Respondent)—you must report the incident, even if other individuals involved are not affiliated with UM. The CRP Office will assess the situation and respond appropriately.
-
You are still required to report it. An incident that occurs off campus does not, by itself, limit UM’s ability to respond. In some cases, where there is a sufficient connection to the University, UM may have jurisdiction to formally investigate the conduct. Even if the University cannot investigate formally, the CRP Office can still offer supportive measures, provide guidance, and, in some cases, take non-punitive steps to address the situation.
-
No, Mandatory Reporters cannot submit anonymous reports; they are required to share all known details, including names, when they learn about possible sexual harassment in the course of their job.
-
Yes. As a mandatory reporter, it’s important to let the student know early in the conversation that you are required to report certain information. This helps build trust and ensures the student understands what will happen next.
Example Script:
“Thank you for sharing your story with me. Before we talk any further I need to remind you that safety and wellbeing are important parts of my job here at UM. I have a responsibility to let the University know if someone may need support and/or resources. The information you share will still remain private, but folks from Title IX will reach out to offer support and resources. It is your choice to speak with them or not.”
-
Yes, it is helpful to inform Ñý¼§Ö±²¥ as early as possible that you have a mandated reporting obligation. Below is an example syllabus statement that you may include:
“As a mandated reporter, I am required to report any incidents of discrimination, harassment, or sexual harassment to the Office of Conflict, Resolution & Policy (CRP). If you wish to speak to someone confidentially, there are confidential resources available at UM (more information is available ). For more information, to make a report, or to seek supportive measures, contact CRP at conflict@umontana.edu, (406) 243-5710, or visit their website at .”
-
As a mandatory reporter, you are still required to report it—even if the student asks you not to. You can explain that the CRP Office will handle the situation with care, offer support, and won’t initiate an investigation unless they must.
-
Failing to report as a mandatory reporter is a violation of an employee’s responsibilities and may result in employment action, such as disciplinary measures. Additionally, not reporting could allow harmful behavior to continue, and the individual who experienced harm may not receive the support or resources they need.
-
Yes. All employees are required to complete Discrimination and Harassment training, which covers relevant UM policies and mandatory reporting obligations. In addition, the CRP Office offers further trainings throughout the academic year. Information about upcoming sessions can be found on the CRP Office’s website.
-
If you're ever unsure about your responsibilities or whether something needs to be reported, you can contact the Conflict, Resolution & Policy (CRP) Office at (406) 243-5710 or conflict@umontana.edu. They’re available to provide guidance and support.